- Title
- P2/N95 respirators & surgical masks to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: effectiveness & adverse effects
- Creator
- Kunstler, Breanne; Newton, Skye; Sim, Malcolm R.; Ferguson, Bridget; Burns, Penelope; King, Nicole; McGloughlin, Steven; Dicks, Melanie; McCarthy, Sally; Tam, Barry; Hazelton, Briony; McGurgan, Cheylynn; Hill, Hayley; McDonald, Steve; Turner, Tari; Ferguson, John; Hore, Phillipa; Mitchell, Brett G.; Dempsey, Kathy; Stewardson, Andrew J.; Friedman, Deborah; Cole, Kate
- Relation
- Infection, Disease and Health Vol. 27, Issue 2, p. 81-95
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2022.01.001
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2022
- Description
- Background: Millions of people have acquired and died from SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE), including surgical masks and P2/N95 respirators, to prevent infection while treating patients. However, the comparative effectiveness of respirators and masks in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and the likelihood of experiencing adverse events (AEs) with wear are unclear. Methods: Searches were carried out in PubMed, Europe PMC and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register to 14 June 2021. A systematic review of comparative epidemiological studies examining SARS-CoV-2 infection or AE incidence in HCWs wearing P2/N95 (or equivalent) respirators and surgical masks was performed. Article screening, risk of bias assessment and data extraction were duplicated. Meta-analysis of extracted data was carried out in RevMan. Results: Twenty-one studies were included, with most having high risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in respirator or surgical mask effectiveness in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.85, [95%CI 0.72, 1.01]). Healthcare workers experienced significantly more headaches (OR 2.62, [95%CI 1.18, 5.81]), respiratory distress (OR 4.21, [95%CI 1.46, 12.13]), facial irritation (OR 1.80, [95%CI 1.03, 3.14]) and pressure-related injuries (OR 4.39, [95%CI 2.37, 8.15]) when wearing respirators compared to surgical masks. Conclusion: The existing epidemiological evidence does not enable definitive assessment of the effectiveness of respirators compared to surgical masks in preventing infection. Healthcare workers wearing respirators may be more likely to experience AEs. Effective mitigation strategies are important to ensure the uptake and correct use of respirators by HCWs.
- Subject
- COVID-19; healthcare personnel; SARS-CoV-2; personal protective equipment; safety; cross infection; SDG 3; Sustainable Development Goals
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1475651
- Identifier
- uon:49615
- Identifier
- ISSN:2468-0451
- Rights
- © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
- Language
- eng
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 10326
- Visitors: 10465
- Downloads: 159
Collections
Goal 3: Good Health and Well-Being
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | ATTACHMENT02 | Publisher version (open access) | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |